IT passed without notice when it occurred in mid-March 1968, at a time
when the war news was still dominated by the siege of Khe Sanh. Yet the
brief action at My Lai, a hamlet in Viet Cong-infested territory 335
miles northeast of Saigon, may yet have an impact on the war. According
to accounts that suddenly appeared on TV and in the world press last
week, a company of 60 or 70 U.S. infantrymen had entered My Lai early
one morning and destroyed its houses, its livestock and all the
inhabitants that they could find in a brutal operation that took less
than 20 minutes. When it was over, the Vietnamese dead totaled at least
100 men, women and children, and perhaps many more. Only 25 or so
escaped, because they lay hidden under the fallen bodies of their
relatives and neighbors. So far, the tale of My Lai has only been told by a few Vietnamese
survivorsall of them pro-V.C.and half a dozen American veterans of
the incident. Yet military men privately concede that stories of what
happened at My Lai are essentially correct. If so, the incident ranks
as the most serious atrocity yet attributed to American troops in a war
that is already well known for its particular savagery. Rather Dark and Bloody. The My Lai incident might never have come to
light. The only people who reported it at the time were the Viet Cong,
who passed out leaflets publicizing the slaughter. To counter the V.C.
accusation, regarded as standard propaganda, the U.S. Army launched a
cursory field investigation, which “did not support” the charges. What
put My Lai on the front pages after 20 months was the conscience of
Richard Ridenhour, 23, a former SP4 who is now a student at Claremont
Men's College in Claremont, Calif. A Viet Nam veteran, Ridenhour had
known many of the men in the outfit involved at My Lai. It was C
Company of the Americal Division's 11 th Infantry Brigade. Ridenhour
did not witness the incident himself, but he kept hearing about it from
friends who were there. He was at first disbelieving, then deeply
disturbed. Last Marcha year after the slaughterhe sent the
information he had pieced together in 30 letters, addressed them to the
President, several Congressmen and other Washington officials. Ridenhour's letter led to a new probeand to formal charges. Last
month, just two days before he was to be released from the Army,
charges of murdering “approximately 100” civilians at My Lai were
preferred against one of C Company's platoon leaders, 1st Lieut.
William Laws Calley Jr., a 26-year-old Miamian now stationed at Fort
Benning, Ga. Last week Staff Sergeant David Mitchell, a 29-year-old
career man from St. Francisville, La., became the second My Lai veteran
to be charged . The Army has
another 24 men under investigation. If
the accounts of others who have spoken out publicly stand up, C
Company, as Ridenhour wrote, is indeed involved in “something rather
dark and bloody” at My Lai. Before the massacre, My Lai was a poor hamlet in Quang Ngai province,
whose low, marshy coastal plains had beenand still area base for
the Viet Cong 48th Battalion. My Lai was a “fortified” hamlet whose
bricked-up houses served as bunkers for marauding V.C. cadres, and was
known to the G.I.s in the area as “Pinkville.”