How you feel about Kim Clijsters doing a split in a frilly orange skirt probably depends on your reaction to a well-oiled Caroline Wozniacki serving a tennis ball into a wind machine. Then again, these provocative scenarios, which form part of the Women’s Tennis Association’s new “Strong is Beautiful” advertising campaign, seem tame compared to the spot starring Belarusian tennis ace Victoria Azarenka. “I like to hit the ball hard. Crush it,” the 2011 Wimbledon semi-finalist says in a voiceover, as the camera pans from crotch to chest to face. “If the ball comes back then it’s trying to tell me something. How about a little harder?”
Some call them racy, others call them inspiring. Either way, the series of photos and commercials that will roll out in 80 countries over the next two years certainly make a statement. Hoping to raise the profile of the women’s game, the WTA filmed 38 of its players — from Serena Williams to Li Na to Petra Kvitova — slugging away at balls that release glitter and colored powder on impact. With thighs bulging and arms taut, the women’s athleticism is meant to cut through the layers of chiffon and lace, and suggest that beauty stems from strength. “The images are very much about power and grit, and artistic beauty as opposed to physical beauty,” says Andrew Walker, chief marketing officer for the tour. “We’re very focused on who our players are: the world’s best female athletes.”
That may be true. But according to a number of sports-media researchers, the campaign — like so many others in female sports—undermines its players’ achievements by sexualizing them, inadvertently or otherwise. And that just adds insult to injury. A recent study found that major television networks in the U.S. devote just 1.6% of airtime to women’s sports — down from 6.3% in 2004 — and across TV and print media, female athletics makes up, at most, 8% of overall sports coverage. When female athletes are featured in ads, it tends to be in ways that hyperfeminize them rather than highlighting their athletic competence. “Yes, these women are beautiful, but we see lots of cleavage and legs, and it’s set to music that is reminiscent of soft-core porn,” says Nicole LaVoi, associate director of the Tucker Center for Research on Girls & Women in Sports at the University of Minnesota. “That might be interesting and titillating, but it isn’t going to make me turn on Wimbledon.”
LaVoi, who writes a popular blog on female athletics called “One Sport Voice,” says there is no evidence that sex actually sells sports. She believes the overwhelming presence of men on executive boards accounts for all the flashing of flesh in ad campaigns for women’s sports, and says they may not even realize what they’re doing. It’s an issue that appears again and again. In May, the World Badminton Federation, hoping to raise the sport’s popularity, decreed that from June 1 all female players must wear skirts on the court “to ensure attractive presentation of badminton.” . In February, the LPGA released its first ad spot in four years. It featured uber-feminine player Natalie Gulbis, despite the fact she is ranked No. 108 in the world. The WNBA has come under fire for focusing campaigns on its more attractive players — like Diana Taurasi, who has long flowing hair and appeared nude on the cover of ESPN magazine last October.
It’s no mystery why these campaigns strictly conform to gender norms, showcasing female athletes as feminine and sensual. It’s the same reason why men’s tennis will probably never run a campaign suggesting “strong is handsome,” or try to court viewers by showing tennis’ new world No. 1 Novak Djokovic with his shirt off. The issue at play is homophobia. “That’s a huge part of this,” says Marie Hardin, associate director of the Curley Center for Sports Journalism at Penn State. “There’s this idea of the lesbian bogeywoman, the predatory lesbian in sports. Unfortunately there’s a real fear mongering that doesn’t help women’s sports at all.”
