The late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat used to be called “the great survivor.” Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad may be succeeding to the title.
Many observers had expected Barack Obama to use a much-anticipated speech on the Middle East to call for Assad to step down, much as Washington has demanded that Muammar Gaddafi relinquish power in Libya. The signs were not good: the day before, the U.S. had slapped sanctions on Assad himself as well as other members of the Syrian regime, which is in the middle of a bloody two-month crackdown against largely peaceful opponents. In recent weeks, the U.S slapped sanctions on the president’s brother, Maher al-Assad, who heads the army’s 4th Brigade, the unit that has largely been tasked with quelling the unrest.
During his speech, however, though Obama pointedly called Damascus an ally and beneficiary of the U.S. bte noire Iran, the American President told an audience at the State Department that the Syrian leader could still participate in a democratic transformation of the troubled nation. “President Assad now has a choice: he can lead that transition, or get out of the way,” Obama said.
Obama was, nevertheless critical of Assad. “The Syrian government must stop shooting demonstrators and allow peaceful protests; release political prisoners and stop unjust arrests; allow human rights monitors to have access to cities like Dara’a [the town where protests first erupted in mid-March]; and start a serious dialogue to advance a democratic transition. Otherwise, President Assad and his regime will continue to be challenged from within and isolated abroad.” The U.S. President then hailed the courage of Syrian protesters and chastised a regime that has “chosen the path of murder and the mass arrests of its citizens.”
That was enough for some critics of the Assad regime. Radwan Ziadeh, a Syrian dissident and executive director of the Syrian Center for Political and Strategic Studies in Washington D.C who attended the president’s speech on Thursday, said Obama hit all the right notes when it came to Syria. “It was excellent. This is exactly what we are looking for,” Ziadeh told TIME. “This will send a very courageous message to the Syrian people on the ground who are fighting for freedom, and for dignity, as President Obama mentioned.”
, said the sanctions and Obama’s speech were largely for a domestic U.S audience. “I heard Obama the candidate, I did not hear Obama the president. He was addressing America under the guise that he was addressing Arab revolutions,” Jabbour told TIME from Damascus. The brief comments on Syria were nothing new, he said. “He repeated what one of his aides said [on Wednesday].” If anything, the slowly hardening U.S position on Syria posed more of a problem for the fragmented, leaderless opposition, said Jabbour who is sympathetic to the regime. “Serious opposition should more or less work together, on an agenda or something like that. But there are groups opposing other groups within the opposition, some of them are totally secular, some are totally religious, some welcome foreign intervention — even military — others feel foreign intervention deprives them of their Syrianness.”
