Under a huge oil painting of King George
VI's coronation, nine peers of the realm gathered last week in a
paneled committee room of the House of Lords. Ranged around a horseshoe
table, the lords listened intently as, one by one, bewigged barristers
rose to argue the fine points of one of the oddest cases in British
legal history—the sort of legal conundrum that could exist only in a
country that still has titles and a nobility. The two opposing
claimants in the case sat stone-faced in the chamber, refusing to meet
each other: Geoffrey Denis Erskine Russell, 54, a prosperous London
theater producer, and John Hugo Trenchard Russell, 25, an accountant
who may—or may not—be Geoffrey's half brother.The case, in fact, hinged upon that relationship. The nine peers,
constituting a Committee of Privileges, were to decide whether John or
Geoffrey should be honored with the title of fourth Baron Ampthill, a
hereditary peerage John is the son of the third Baron Ampthill by his
third wife. Geoffrey, who now holds the title, was born during the
third baron's marriage to his first wife. The bizarre story behind
John's challenge is that Geoffrey's mother was, by her own testimony
and expert medical opinion a virgin when Geoffrey was born.The House of Lords hearing resurrected one of Britain's most publicized
scandals of the early 1920s, a story that has since been tagged as
“The Case of the Virgin Birth.” It involved a tall young
aristocrat, John Russell then heir to the Ampthill
title, his vivacious and liberated wife Christabel and her baby
Geoffrey, who was born in October 1921. Soon after Geoffrey's birth,
John Russell filed for divorce charging that the baby could not
possibly be his. He claimed that he and his wife had agreed before the
wedding to lead separate lives and leave the marriage unconsummated.Christabel Russell admitted that she had never had full intercourse with
her husband. But she insisted that she had not had sex with any other
man either. Her proof: after learning that she was pregnant, she had
undergone a medical examination. Doctors testified that she was still
technically a virgin; her hymen had been only partly perforated. How
then had the baby been conceived? During a night of “Hunnish” behavior
ten months before Geoffrey's birth, she testified, when her husband
tried to force her to have intercourse, but succeeded only in an
incomplete act. He flatly denied any such behavior occurred.One divorce trial ended without a decision, but a second in 1923
explored the details again. Christabel, her husband charged, had
cavorted across the Continent, writing home about “slim, silky
Argentines” and “marcel-waved” Italians who courted, wined and dined
her. She still insisted that they had not slept with her; medical
experts conceded that her story of Geoffrey's conception might be true.
A ten-month gestation was not unknown, they said. Impregnation without
penetration, though rare, was possible. Still, the jury in the second
divorce trial found her guilty of adultery with an unnamed man.
